Here are some of the things I’ve been thinking about:

The two areas in trading that separate the men from the boys (so to speak) are:

1.) The ability to divide environmental perceptions in half and process them separately. First I ask myself what I am feeling and in doing so I acknowledge and honor the feelings so that they don’t cry out for expression on the chart. Then and only then I ask the market what it is telling me. (I used to combine these two observations; I used to subconsciously deny how I was feeling because I knew it was wrong to let my feelings dictate a trade and so the feelings were bleeding into my technical observations because I had not acknowledged them and honored them.)

2.) The ability to execute according to #1 as if I am even or in the black when I am in the red. If during my 90 minutes of trading (09:30 -
11:00), I’m in the red, usually the feeling is something like “I’m afraid! I want to be in the market! I want to be in a trade!”

re A.N.N.A.:

I realized it’s not enough to intellectually understand ANNA. I had to write my own version of the ANNA software for my own internal hardware. When I learned to ride a bike, even though I’d observed someone else doing it and they told me how, I still had to write the program in my own head about how to balance and pedal. It couldn’t be just an intellectual understanding.

re trading plan rules:

I think that if you need strict rules, you’re not ready to trade cash. Strict rules mean that you’re not in control of your emotional feedback
in a live market. I’m not tape reading and I have general ideas about where I get in a trade (ideally the pullback at the end of a trend) but
I don’t have strict rules because it seems trading is an art not a science.

-Trader Diagnosis

There must be 10,000 lists like this… let me add mine – hopefully with many useful twists.

1. You need to know what you are looking for – both to enter the market and to exit.

2. You need to know what the variations on #1 are – and what they are not!

3. You need to know what is imprecise about what you are looking for – it is more than you think.

4. You need to have thought about the imprecision long before you sit in front of the screen and certainly not just as you push the button.

5. You need to know what it will feel like if you turn out to be wrong.

6. You need to know how you will handle, manage, learn from and deal with that feeling.

7. You need to know what it will feel like if you are right – and again, how you will handle, manage, learn from and deal with it.

8. You need to know how to operate on the premise that “perfect is the enemy of the good”.

CNBC – fast, accurate, actionable…. (never mind the middle one)…. BOOK EDITOR – “but what are they supposed to do?” MAG EDITOR ” – but they need things to act on” …………..

UGH>>> doesn’t anyone understand the value of thinking before acting anymore? Doesn’t anyone understand that understanding is key to accomplishment? … and most of all, doesn’t anyone get that most of trading is NOT trading?

— END OF RANT —

– Never mind.. not done –

Most of the time we are doing because it is hard (boring, uncomfortable) to just BE.

But there is a ton of info inside if we stop and listen to it. Some is prickly and some is positively brilliant. We have to stop and listen to know the difference. This applies to the judgments demanded by the markets too.

What ever happened to learning? Why does everything have to be doing? Why does everyone want to be told what to do?

As you can tell, I am annoyed and mystified. I believe in knowing my spots and waiting for them

…Isn’t it overtrading that kills most accounts?