<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wow! &#8230;what a market &amp; CME&#8217;s Global Financial Leadership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://traderpsyches.com/wow-what-a-market-cmes-global-financial-leadership-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://traderpsyches.com/wow-what-a-market-cmes-global-financial-leadership-2</link>
	<description>Trading Psychology, the Thinking Man&#039;s Market Psychology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 04:52:33 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DKS</title>
		<link>http://traderpsyches.com/wow-what-a-market-cmes-global-financial-leadership-2/comment-page-1#comment-1449</link>
		<dc:creator>DKS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://traderpsyches.com/blog/?p=38#comment-1449</guid>
		<description>Mark, they would have brought more liquidity to the CDO&#039;s traded primarily between BSC, GS, MS, MER, JPM and a relatively small group of others (compared to any other sort of liquid market) ...

that along with maybe a review of mark-to-market accounting could have had a positive effect on the depth and severity of this crisis. I am not saying it would have averted it completely but I am saying that small and opaque markets made it much much worse than it had to be. As soon as one instrument was in trouble, everyone else was too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, they would have brought more liquidity to the CDO&#8217;s traded primarily between BSC, GS, MS, MER, JPM and a relatively small group of others (compared to any other sort of liquid market) &#8230;</p>
<p>that along with maybe a review of mark-to-market accounting could have had a positive effect on the depth and severity of this crisis. I am not saying it would have averted it completely but I am saying that small and opaque markets made it much much worse than it had to be. As soon as one instrument was in trouble, everyone else was too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://traderpsyches.com/wow-what-a-market-cmes-global-financial-leadership-2/comment-page-1#comment-1448</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 06:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://traderpsyches.com/blog/?p=38#comment-1448</guid>
		<description>I love specs; some of my best friends are specs, but...central banks, fractional reserves, fiat currency, mercantilist/fascist gov - thats too much, even for specs. Glaciers are melting, sea level is rising, so specs are going to do what? Bring liquidity to the ocean?  Ponzi goes to the sky , forever &amp; ever, as long as we can roll into the next contract?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love specs; some of my best friends are specs, but&#8230;central banks, fractional reserves, fiat currency, mercantilist/fascist gov &#8211; thats too much, even for specs. Glaciers are melting, sea level is rising, so specs are going to do what? Bring liquidity to the ocean?  Ponzi goes to the sky , forever &amp; ever, as long as we can roll into the next contract?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
